Showing posts with label Pin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pin. Show all posts

Saturday, June 26, 2021

P Is For Pin X

Game Of The Week


A couple years back, I came up with a method to organize chess tactics.  I called it the DROP Method.  The DROP method is an acronym for the basic kinds of tactics.  It is meant to remind you not to drop your pieces and help you get your opponent to drop theirs.

I said that the DROP Method was a work in progress, and it was.  So, I thought I would revisit each of the four kinds of chess tactics to provide more examples.  

The first kind of tactic in the DROP Method is Discovery, which I revisited on June 12th (https://cschessnews.blogspot.com/2021/06/d-is-for-discovery-ix.html).  

The second kind of tactic in the DROP Method is Removal, which I revisited on June 19th (https://cschessnews.blogspot.com/2021/06/r-is-for-removal-x.html).  

The third kind of tactic in the DROP Method is Overload, which I revisited on June 22nd.

The fourth kind of tactic in the DROP Method is Pin.

Pin is a chess move that immobilizes an opponent's piece.

The Pin is different from the other kinds of tactics in that it does not create multiple threats.  Its main function is to prevent a piece from moving.  A Pin on a target allows that target to be attacked by a lower value piece.  A Pin on a support allows the capture of the piece the support is guarding.

“The pin is mightier than the sword.”
Fred Reinfeld

The Pin works by threatening a low value piece that has a higher value piece (or an unguarded piece) behind it.  The low value piece is stuck (as if with a pin) to the higher value piece due to the loss of material should the low value piece move and allow the capture of the higher value piece.

If the higher value piece is the King, the low value piece is absolutely immobilized, as the rules of Chess do not allow moves where the King could be captured.  Otherwise the Pin is relative, as the opponent can actually move the low value piece if he is willing to accept the loss of material.  The other types of Pins are rare:

  • Absolute (Pins a target to the King)
  • Relative (Pins a low value target to a higher value piece)
  • Cross (Multiple Pins on one piece)
  • Cross-check (blocks check and counter-checks)

Here is an example from the 26th Annual Colorado Springs City Chess Championship:  Qualifier.  Will Wolf was trying to persuade me that his game was all theory.   I just looked at this position and said, "Oh, yeah, from the book of Pretty Little Pincushions."  There are so many Pins or potential Pins in this position that it might be hard to choose which one to exploit.  The Black Queen is pinned to the King (Absolute), and the Black Night is pinned to the Rook (Relative).  Can you find the one that works?

See diagram on blog
White to move

P Is For Pin X


[Event "City Speed Chess Qualifier"]
[Site "https://cschessnews.blogspot.com/"]
[Date "2021.06.23"]
[Round "3.4"]
[White "Wolf, Will"]
[Black "Herman, Shirley"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B18"]
[WhiteElo "1398"]
[BlackElo "883"]
[PlyCount "47"]
[EventDate "2021.06.23"]
[TimeControl "300"]

1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 dxe4 4. Nxe4 Bf5 5. Ng3
Bg6 6. f4 Nf6 7. f5 e6 8. fxg6 Bb4+ 9. c3 Bd6 10. Bd3 hxg6 11. Nf3 Bxg3+ 12.
hxg3 Rxh1+ 13. Bf1 Ne4 14. Qd3 Nxg3 15. Bg5 Nxf1 16. Kf2 f6 17. Qxg6+ Kd7 18.
Qxg7+ Qe7 19. Ne5+ Ke8 20. Qg8+ Qf8 21. Qxe6+ Qe7 22. Qc8+ Qd8 23. Qxb7 Na6 24.
Qf7# 1-0

https://www.chessvideos.tv/chess-game-replayer.php?id=116689



This Week In Chess


On June 23rd, the Colorado Springs Chess Club held the 26th Annual Colorado Springs City Chess Championship:  Qualifier  (6SS, G/5+0).  Buck Buchanan, Daniel Herman, Clint Eads, George Krasnopolskiy, Jose Llacza, and Mark McGough finished in the top 6 to qualify for the Championship round next week.  The remaining players will move on to the Consolation round next week.

Place, City Speed Chess Qualifier, Score

1 Richard Buchanan 6.0
2 Daniel Herman 4.5
3 Clinton Eads 4.0
4 Geo Krasnopolskiy 4.0
5 Jose Llacza Magno 3.5
6 Mark McGough 3.5
7 Joseph H Pahk 3.5
8 William Leo Wolf 3.0
9 Alec Lane 3.0
10 Patru Dumitru 3.0
11 Drew Tirado 2.0
12 Hagan Hensley 2.0
13 Shirley Herman 2.0
14 Ryan Dunagin 2.0
15 Rick Hensley 1.0
16 Jessica Diosdado 1.0

Friday, September 25, 2020

Honorary Medal

Game Of The Week


This week's game comes from the Colorado Springs Chess Club's event:  CSCC Other Side Rapid Online (3SS, G/10+10).  It was played by Rhett Langseth and Alayne Wilinsky.

Rhett was nice enough to test out the online tournament's re-entry feature.  The question was:  Can players withdraw from the event and then re-enter the event when they are available again?  The answer is:  Maybe.

Perhaps it might work in larger events.  However, the computer limits the number of late entrants an event can have based on the number of players in the first round.  So, our small event may have exceeded our allotment of late entrants.  If the computer considers re-entries the same as late entrants, then it would deny a re-entry because all late entries had been used.  Or it just denies re-entries all together.  Who knows?  At least, it is clear there is no guarantee.

Alayne was nice enough to give Rhett the draw and the bronze.  She survived his tactical shots and had the better endgame.  However, she chose to repeat the position rather than push on for the win.  I can understand her choice since I thought I had a draw against Rhett until I moved into a Knight Fork and hung my Rook.

I felt bad when I beat Alayne in the final round and she lost out on the bronze medal by tie breaks.  I think I saw it was her birthday from my weekly visit to facebook, and after collecting my 6th silver medal, I realized I could have been more generous by not playing my usual, brilliant openings and give her a shot at her first medal in our Corona Chess Olympics.

So, the Game Of The Week's prize goes to Alayne Wilinsky for creating this position.

See diagram on blog
White to move

Honorary Medal


[Event "CSCC Other Side Online"]
[Site "https://cschessnews.blogspot.com/"]
[Date "2020.09.20"]
[Round "2.1"]
[White "Langseth, Rhett"]
[Black "Wilinsky, Alayne"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "A04"]
[WhiteElo "1888"]
[BlackElo "1356"]
[PlyCount "190"]
[EventDate "2020.09.20"]
[TimeControl "600+10"]

1. Nf3 f5 2. d3 Nf6 3. Nbd2 g6 4. c3 Bg7 5. e4 fxe4 6. dxe4 d6 7. Qb3 e6 8. e5 dxe5 9. Bc4 Nd5 10. Ne4 O-O 11. Bg5 Qd7 12. O-O-O Nc6 13. Bxd5 exd5 14. Rxd5 Qe6 15. Rhd1 Kh8 16. Bd8 Qf5 17. Neg5 h6 18. h4 hxg5 19. hxg5 Qf4+ 20. Kb1 Bf5+ 21. Ka1 Nxd8 22. Rh1+ Bh6 23. Rxh6+ Kg7 24. Qd1 Nf7 25. Rh4 Bg4 26. Qh1 Nxg5 27. Nxg5 Qxg5 28. Rh7+ Kf6 29. Rxc7 Rad8 30. Rcc5 Rxd5 31. Rxd5 Ke6 32. c4 Rxf2 33. Qe1 Qf4 34. Rxe5+ Qxe5 35. Qxf2 Bf5 36. a3 Qe4 37. Ka2 Qb1+ 38. Kb3 Bc2+ 39. Kc3 Bf5 40. b3 a5 41. Qb6+ Ke5 42. Qxa5+ Kf4 43. Qc7+ Kg5 44. Qe7+ Kg4 45. Qe2+ Kg5 46. Qe3+ Kf6 47. Qd4+ Kg5 48. Qd2+ Kf6 49. g3 Qa1+ 50. Kb4 Qe5 51. Qf2 Kg5 52. Qf3 Qd6+ 53. Kc3 Qe5+ 54. Kb4 Qd6+ 55. c5 Qd4+ 56. Kb5 Bd7+ 57. Kb6 Bc6 58. Qf8 Kh5 59. b4 Qd3 60. Qh8+ Kg5 61. Qh4+ Kf5 62. Qf4+ Ke6 63. Qg5 Qb5+ 64. Kc7 Qd3 65. Kb6 Qb5+ 66. Kc7 Qd3 67. Qg4+ Ke7 68. Kb6 Qb5+ 69. Kc7 Qd3 70. Kb8 Qd8+ 71. Ka7 Qd3 72. Qg5+ Kf7 73. Qf4+ Ke7 74. Qe5+ Kf7 75. Qc7+ Kf6 76. Qf4+ Ke7 77. Qg4 Qxa3+ 78. Kb6 Qa6+ 79. Kc7 Qd3 80. Kb6 Qb5+ 81. Kc7 Qd3 82. Qg5+ Kf7 83. Qf4+ Ke7 84. Qe5+ Kf7 85. Qf4+ Ke7 86. Qe5+ Kf7 87. Kb8 Qd8+ 88. Ka7
Qd3 89. Kb6 Qb5+ 90. Kc7 Qxb4 91. Qd6 Qa5+ 92. Kc8 Qa8+ 93. Kc7 Qa5+ 94. Kc8 Qa8+ 95. Kc7 Qa5+ 1/2-1/2



This Week In Chess


On September 20th, the Colorado Springs Chess Club held our Sunday Night Online Event.

https://www.chess.com/tournament/live/cscc-other-side-rapid-online-1582062

Place, CSCC Other Side Rapid Online, Score

1 "#1 Czechmate1972 (1658)" 3.0
2 "#2 cschessnews (1608)" 2.0
3 "#3 Termenoil (1848)" 1.5
4 "#4 alaynew (1352)" 1.5
5 "#5 jfoxhoot (1590)" 1.0
6 "#6 KingVed (1457)" 0.0
7 "- Wazzat (1967)" 1.0
8 "- bazinga2 (1582)" 0.0
9 "- bestatcheckers7 (1594)" 0.0

Friday, September 11, 2020

Full Commitment

Game Of The Week

By Andy Rea


[editor: This week's game comes from the Colorado Springs Chess Club's event:  CSCC Illegal Landing Rapid Online (4SS, G/10+10).  It was played by Andy Rea and DuWayne Langseth and actually comes from one of the players!]

It is not the best of form to nominate oneself for Game Of The Week, but I think my Round 3 win against DuWayne Langseth was fairly interesting and entertaining.  Not to be confused with sound, but then, I had sound and mundane and ordinary, think boring, in Rounds 1, 2, and 4.  The win in Round 3 also proved vital in winning the Illegal Sunday tournament!

I had White.

1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 e6 3.c4 f5 4.Bf4 Bd6 5.Bxd6 Qxd6 6.Nc3 c6 7.cd ed 8.e3 Nd7 9.Be2 Ngf6 10.0-0 0-0 11.Qc2 Ne4

So far so good for Black.  The trend has him hitting Kingside while White is able to spectate and observe.

12.Rac1 Rf6 13.a3 Rh6 14.g3 Qg6

This has gotten serious.  It's as though Black is trying to win!  I spent a fair amount of time, considering its G/10, trying to find something sturdy and steely.  That sometimes works, as happened in Round 4. Here though, Black is able to keep hitting the White King.  So, time to change the subject, even though the price is wrong!

15.Nxd5 cd 16.Qxc8+

Full commitment, for better or worse!

16...Rxc8 17.Rxc8+ Nf8

Black passes the first test, not allowing the annoying forkly pinly.

17...Kf7 18.Rc7. 18.Ne5 Qe6 19.Rd8

The whole idea is that if Black is not allowing himself to get bagged on the back ranks, then Be2 has to do something.  But there is good news:  Black is not attacking!  Sure, Black could play 19...Nd6 20.Rc1, there's still some fun stuff for White.  Albeit probably not ending well, but it would be interesting!  The really nice news is that Black doesn't play 19...f4 20.ef Qh3 21.Nf3 Nd2, reminding White that there is more than one King on the board...

19...Qe7? 20.Rxd5 Rd6

Black saves his King but I could hardly have done a better job of stopping his attack!  True, objectively Black is better, but White has plenty of potshots lurking out there, and for now Kg1 is not completely stressed out.

21.Rb5 a6 22.Rb4 Qc7 23.Bc4+

Turns out Black does not get the c-file after all.  This miscalculation very much keeps White alive if not still fully well.

23...Ne6 24.Rc1 Kf8 25.Nd3 Rc6

This looks bad but turns out to not be awful.

26.d5 Rd6 27.Bxa6 Qd8 28.Bxb7

Here, yes, Black cannot be a fan of Rc8xd8... but, there were other squares for the Queen.  Black is also nervous about an ending where White has 2 connected Queenside passers rendering an extra Black piece fairly harmless.  Anyway, I trust that our readers can find better than Blacks unfortunate choice.  Not that this is so easy when the players are in time pressure right from move 1 on!

28...Qf6? 29.de Rxd3 30.Bxe4 fe 31.Re4

And White's pieces have stumbled into the endzone, shades of The Man From New York Life, as our older readers may recall... In any event, trying to save this as Black with not a lot of time, best wishes.

31...Ke7 32.Rc7+ Ke8 33.e7 Qf5 34.Rf4 Rd1+ 35.Kg2 Qd5+ 36.e4

Some 4-5 moves ago I was down to 17 seconds, but the increment was helpful.  Black also was inside the last minute, and as happens in these time shortages, the mistakes on defense are more brutal, per previous note.  I am not seeing any escape here for Black.

36...Qg8 37.Rc8+ Kxe7 38.Rxg8

And here Black did not see any need to test White's endgame technique. 1-0

DuWayne has been playing well against me previously.  I am glad to finally get a win and to then win the final round to win the tournament, always a good deal, worth more than the price of admission!

Postscript:  It can also be fairly observed DuWayne would have concerns about ...f5-f4 getting hit by Be2-g4.  I might have made it seem like he missed an obvious defense when that is not the case.  The chips were falling well for me that game.

See diagram on blog
White to move

Full Commitment


[Event "CSCC Illegal Landing Online"]
[Site "https://cschessnews.blogspot.com/"]
[Date "2020.09.06"]
[Round "3.1"]
[White "Rea, Andy"]
[Black "Langseth, DuWayne"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "D30"]
[WhiteElo "1644"]
[BlackElo "1591"]
[PlyCount "75"]
[EventDate "2020.09.06"]
[TimeControl "600+10"]

1. d4 d5 2. Nf3 e6 3. c4 f5 4. Bf4 Bd6 5. Bxd6 Qxd6 6. Nc3 c6 7. cxd5 exd5 8. e3 Nd7 9. Be2 Ngf6 10. O-O O-O 11. Qc2 Ne4 12. Rac1 Rf6 13. a3 Rh6 14. g3 Qg6 15. Nxd5 cxd5 16. Qxc8+ Rxc8 17. Rxc8+ Nf8 18. Ne5 Qe6 19. Rd8 Qe7 20. Rxd5 Rd6 21. Rb5 a6 22. Rb4 Qc7 23. Bc4+ Ne6 24. Rc1 Kf8 25. Nd3 Rc6 26. d5 Rd6 27. Bxa6 Qd8 28. Bxb7 Qf6 29. dxe6 Rxd3 30. Bxe4 fxe4 31. Rxe4 Ke7 32. Rc7+ Ke8 33. e7 Qf5 34. Rf4 Rd1+ 35. Kg2 Qd5+ 36. e4 Qg8 37. Rc8+ Kd7 38. Rxg8 1-0

https://www.chessvideos.tv/chess-game-replayer.php?id=115754


This Week In Chess


On September 6th, the Colorado Springs Chess Club held the CSCC Illegal Landing Rapid Online event (4SS, G/10+10).

https://www.chess.com/tournament/live/cscc-illegal-landing-rapid-online-1553866

Place, CSCC Illegal Landing Rapid Online (4SS, G/10+10), Score

1 "#1 dzhierkiev64 (1866)" 3.5
2 "#2 msmcgough (1507)" 3.0
3 "#3 DuWayneL (1569)" 2.0
4 "#4 Czechmate1972 (1627)" 2.0
5 "#5 jfoxhoot (1600)" 2.0
6 "#6 Termenoil (1860)" 1.0
7 "#7 SHerman2 (1008)" 1.0
8 "#8 linuxguy1 (1420)" 0.5
9 "- Honeybrook (1350)" 1.0
10 "- cschessnews (1614)" 0.0

Saturday, July 18, 2020

P Is For Pin IX

Game Of The Week


A couple years back, I came up with a method to organize chess tactics.  I called it the DROP Method (https://cschessnews.blogspot.com/2012/03/drop-method.html).  The DROP method is an acronym for the basic kinds of tactics.  It is meant to remind you not to drop your pieces and help you get your opponent to drop theirs.

I said that the DROP Method was a work in progress, and it was.  So, I thought I would revisit each of the four kinds of chess tactics to provide more examples.


The fourth kind of tactic in the DROP Method is Pin.

Pin is a chess move that immobilizes an opponent's piece.

The Pin is different from the other kinds of tactics in that it does not create multiple threats.  Its main function is to prevent a piece from moving.  A Pin on a target allows that target to be attacked by a lower value piece.  A Pin on a support allows the capture of the piece the support is guarding.

“The pin is mightier than the sword.”

Fred Reinfeld

The Pin works by threatening a low value piece that has a higher value piece (or an unguarded piece) behind it.  The low value piece is stuck (as if with a pin) to the higher value piece due to the loss of material should the low value piece move and allow the capture of the higher value piece.

If the higher value piece is the King, the low value piece is absolutely immobilized, as the rules of Chess do not allow moves where the King could be captured.  Otherwise the Pin is relative, as the opponent can actually move the low value piece if he is willing to accept the loss of material.  The other types of Pins are rare:

  • Absolute (Pins a target to the King)
  • Relative (Pins a low value target to a higher value piece)
  • Cross (Multiple Pins on one piece)
  • Cross-check (blocks check and counter-checks)

Here is an example from the Colorado Springs Chess Club's Sunday-night event:  CSCC Killer Bloodgood Rapid Online.  Alex Bozhenov was going for his first medal in our online summer games and trying to stay unbeaten in Rapid time control.  However, LM Brian Wall was trying to take the lead in the medal count and grabbed a Pawn in the opening.  Alex had a golden shot to win the game but picked the 2nd best move and ended up with the silver.

See diagram on blog
White to move

P Is For Pin IX


[Event "CSCC Killer Bloodgood Rapid Online"]
[Site "https://cschessnews.blogspot.com/"]
[Date "2020.07.12"]
[Round "3.1"]
[White "Bozhenov, Alex"]
[Black "Wall, Brian"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "D94"]
[WhiteElo "1808"]
[BlackElo "1946"]
[PlyCount "62"]
[EventDate "2020.07.12"]
[TimeControl "600+10"]

1. Nf3 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e3 O-O 5. d4 c5 6. Be2 d5 7. O-O Nc6 8. cxd5 Nxd5 9. e4 Nxc3 10. bxc3 cxd4 11. cxd4 Nxd4 12. Nxd4 Qxd4 13. Qxd4 Bxd4 14. Rb1 b6 15. Bh6 Rd8 16. Rfc1 Rd7 17. Bb5 Bc5 18. Bxd7 Bxd7 19. Be3 Bxe3 20. fxe3 Be6 21. Rb2 Kg7 22. Rc7 Kf6 23. Kf2 g5 24. h3 h5 25. Kf3 h4 26. a4 Ke5 27. Rxe7 Kd6 28. Rb7 Kc6 29. Re7 Kd6 30. Rb7 Kc6 31. Re7 Kd6 1/2-1/2

https://www.chessvideos.tv/chess-game-replayer.php?id=115616



This Week In Chess


On July 12th, the Colorado Springs Chess Club held the CSCC Killer Bloodgood Rapid Online event (4SS, G/10+10).

https://www.chess.com/tournament/live/cscc-killer-bloodgood-rapid-online-1313555

Place, CSCC Killer Bloodgood (4SS, G/10+10), Score

1 "#1 NM BrianWall (1958)" 3.5
2 "#2 bozhenoff (1788)" 3.0
3 "#3 cschessnews (1694)" 2.5
4 "#4 JJ7X (1771)" 2.0
5 "#5 KingVed (1471)" 2.0
6 "#6 Czechmate1972 (1569)" 2.0
7 "#7 CosmicNovaGalaxy (1342)" 1.0
8 "#8 liencam2 (1180)" 0.0
9 "- Navajo36us80917 (1130)" 1.0
10 "- msmcgough (1487)" 0.0

Thursday, June 25, 2020

Killer Latency

Game Of The Week


This week's game comes from the Colorado Springs Chess Club's event:  CSCC Overload Rapid Online (4SS, G/10+10).  It was played by Jose Llacza and Mark McGough.  They have faced each other twice online.  Jose got the first game, and Mark evened the score with this game.

Mark has a little more experience with the rapid time control with 30 games versus 24 games by Jose.  However, Jose has fared better with 17 wins to Mark's 14 wins.  I don't know if they have played each other over the board, as the USCF website was hacked, and I couldn't get any statistics from them to pad my blog.

I did find out that Mark's most common rapid opponent online is Dean Brown!

In any case, Mark was on fire this night.  He moved from playing on his tablet to playing on his phone.  He told me that he made the switch to avoid the latency.  I was not sure exactly what he meant by this.  However, after seeing him score a 98.6% accuracy and winning his first virtual medal, I am guessing he was referring to his undeveloped and unmanifested ability to attack in a chess game.  It had always been in a state of existence, but it was concealed from the online viewers prior to this game.

Now, his latent ability was, at last, revealed with this killer move.

See diagram on blog
Black to move

Killer Latency


[Event "CSCC Overload Rapid Online"]
[Site "https://cschessnews.blogspot.com/"]
[Date "2020.06.21"]
[Round "1.2"]
[White "Llacza, Jose"]
[Black "McGough, Mark"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "D32"]
[WhiteElo "1689"]
[BlackElo "1467"]
[PlyCount "38"]
[EventDate "2020.06.21"]
[TimeControl "600+10"]

1. c4 e6 2. d4 Nf6 3. Nc3 c5 4. Nf3 cxd4 5. Qxd4 Nc6 6. Qd1 d5 7. cxd5 exd5 8. e3 a6 9. Be2 Bc5 10. O-O O-O 11. h3 b5 12. a3 Bb7 13. b4 Bb6 14. Bb2 d4 15. exd4 Nxd4 16. Nxd4 Qxd4 17. Qb3 Qf4 18. Bc1 Qg3 19. Rb1 Qxg2# 0-1

https://www.chessvideos.tv/chess-game-replayer.php?id=115553



This Week In Chess


On June 21st, the Colorado Springs Chess Club held the CSCC Overload Rapid Online event (4SS, G/10+10).

https://www.chess.com/tournament/live/cscc-overload-rapid-online-1275546

Place, CSCC Overload (4SS, G/10+10), Score

1 "#1DFSStar (2105)" 3.5
2 "#2msmcgough (1487)" 3.0
3 "#3JJ7X (1830)" 2.5
4 "#4CosmicNovaGalaxy (1347)" 2.0
5 "#5cschessnews (1737)" 2.0
6 "#6Navajo36us80917 (1119)" 2.0
7 "#7jfoxhoot (1525)" 1.0
8 "#8Honeybrook (1314)" 1.0
9 "-Skadelig (1395)" 0.0

Sunday, May 10, 2020

D Is For Discovery VIII

Game Of The Week


A couple years back, I came up with a method to organize chess tactics.  I called it the DROP Method (https://cschessnews.blogspot.com/2012/03/drop-method.html).  The DROP method is an acronym for the basic kinds of tactics.  It is meant to remind you not to drop your pieces and help you get your opponent to drop theirs.

I said that the DROP Method was a work in progress, and it was.  So, I thought I would revisit each of the four kinds of chess tactics to provide more examples.  The first kind of tactic in the DROP Method is Discovery.

Discovery is a chess move that attacks with two pieces.

The Discovery is played when a player is going to make an attack with the piece that he moves, but also he will make an attack with another piece that was blocked by the piece that he moves.  When the Discovery is successful, the opponent can only avoid one of the attacks.  This means that the other attack will gain material or mate.  The second attack is often a check on the King, which is called a Discovered Check.

"Discovered check is the dive bomber of the Chessboard."

Reuben Fine

Here is a position from game 50 played between myself and my dad in our email match.  There are actually two good moves here.  I found the immediate Discovery, but see if you can find the delayed Discovery too.

See diagram on blog
White to move

D Is For Discovery VIII


[Event "20-14-16"]
[Site "https://cschessnews.blogspot.com/"]
[Date "2009.03.03"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Anderson, Paul"]
[Black "Anderson, Douglas"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "A21"]
[PlyCount "77"]
[EventDate "2008.10.15"]
[TimeControl "40/5400:0/0:3600"]

1. c4 e5 2. Nc3 a6 3. Nf3 Nc6 4. a3 Bc5 5. e3 h6 6. b4 Ba7 7. Bb2 d6 8. Qc2 Bg4 9. h3 Bh5 10. Bd3 Nge7 11. Nh4 f6 12. Ng6 Rg8 13. g4 Bxg6 14. Bxg6+ Kf8 15. Be4 Rb8 16. h4 Qd7 17. O-O-O Qxg4 18. h5 Qd7 19. f3 f5 20. Bd3 Kf7 21. Bf1 Rbf8 22. Bh3 Ke8 23. Kb1 Kd8 24. Ne2 Qe8 25. d4 exd4 26. exd4 Qxh5 27. Nf4 Qxf3 28. Ne6+ Ke8 29. Bg2 Qg4 30. c5 Rf7 31. Nxc7+ Kd7 32. cxd6 Kxd6 33. Ne6 Rc8 34. Nc5 Nd8 35. Rdg1 Bxc5 36. dxc5+ Kc7 37. Qd3 Kb8 38. Qd6+ Ka8 39. Bxb7+ 1-0

https://www.chessvideos.tv/chess-game-replayer.php?id=115437


This Week In Chess


On May 3rd, the Colorado Springs Chess Club held the CSCC Requited Queen Rapid Online event (4SS, G/10+10).

https://www.chess.com/tournament/live/cscc-requited-queen-rapid-online-1214278

Place, Player, Score

1 "#1NMBrianWall (1909)" 3.5
2 "#2cschessnews (1706)" 3.0
3 "#3jfoxhoot (1579)" 2.5
4 "#4HermitCrab0 (1463)" 2.0
5 "#5KingVed (1464)" 2.0
6 "#6msmcgough (1433)" 2.0
7 "#6mrpicklez (1959)" 2.0
8 "#8aelvr (1399)" 2.0
9 "#9alaynew (1311)" 1.0
10 "#10Navajo36us80917 (1056)" 1.0
11 "-liencam2 (1247)" 1.0
12 "#10linuxguy1 (1534)" 1.0

Wednesday, April 8, 2020

Game Of The Year XVI

Start Of The Season

Sunday, April 12, 2020


The times are changing.  Historically, I put out my Game Of The Year at the end of my chess publishing season some time in August.  For 2019, I did not get it done.  I have been spending the off-season looking for some excuse why I did not publishing the 16th version of the Game Of The Year.

Then Coronavirus hit!  The Colorado Springs Chess Club was closed; businesses went dark; the streets became desolate, and toilet paper can only be purchased on the dark web.  Now, I had the perfect justification for my lack of chess writing.

However, the more I thought about it; the more I realized how essential chess is to the victory over this dreaded plague.  Clearly, chess is the greatest tool for social distancing since the invention of body odor.

I have been social distancing ever since I downloaded a chess app to my phone.  I convinced myself that moving from sleeping in bed to playing chess on the couch meant I was up and being productive since, technically, I am a chess professional and any practice counts as work.  In addition, my favorite aspect of chess club is the fact that I can escape any boring social interaction with three simple words, "My opponent moved."

Unfortunately, the stay-at-home order has been extended.  Not enough people are practicing safe space.  Well, I have decided to do my part.  My plan is to resurrect the Colorado Springs Chess Club and convert more people into social distancing masters by offering online tournaments for the club.

The Colorado Springs Chess Club will try out our first online event this Sunday, April 12th at 8 pm.  You just need a free chess.com account and join the Colorado Springs Chess Club.

Stay home and play chess!

Game Of The Year


The Game Of The Year comes from a Quick-rated game given to me by LM Gunnar Andersen.  He won the 2020 Colorado Springs City Speed Chess Championship in January and became the 11th champion.  Unfortunately, the speed games are not recorded.  So, I picked the next best thing.

However, I also wanted to tell you about my best victory from last year.  It came from my encounter with the auto insurance company Progressive.  If you are just interested in the chess, then feel free to skip over my rant.

[Begin Rant]

Filing an insurance claim can be like a chess game.  You will need a lot of patience; it helps to look at all the legal moves you have and be familiar with the tactics your opponent will employ.  After all, your opponent will use all the time allowed and still not resign no matter how bad their position is.

When I was finally finished with my ordeal with Progressive, I thought I should share my experience with others.  I had spent a lot of time researching how I could beat them and wanted to record some of the things I learned just in case someone may need advice in the future.  However, coming up with a title for the blog was difficult.  I wasn't sure how much emotion to convey.

  • How To Sue An Insurance Company In Small Claims Court
  • How To Win $2,914.57
  • I Still Hate Progressive
  • Flo Blows

Finally, I just decided to make it my Game Of The Year.  After all, it was my best win of 2019 and a better payday than any chess tournament I have won.

Before I get into the details, here are the main lessons I learned:

  • Get off the phone
  • Get to court
  • Get 3 estimates

"The accident was simple," I thought.  Someone backed into my parked car on November 9, 2018.  I was not even in the vehicle at the time.  He apologized and gave me his insurance information.

I had a similar accident 10 years earlier.  I made one call to State Farm.  They said, "We are sorry, pick a repair place, and we can help with the rental."  I never had to speak to them again, and my car was restored to its previous glory.

With Progressive, the tactics started on the first call.  They will push you to use their repair place and get you in before they have to mail out the state required notice that you have a legal right to choose your own repair company in Colorado.

Then the lies will come.

The repair place I chose said, "We can submit the estimate.  Who is the insurance company?"  When I told them it was Progressive, they groaned.  But they had worked with Progressive before and emailed the company and myself the estimate within one day.  But, I heard nothing.

When I called, Progressive said, "We never got the estimate."  Now, I realized this was going to be a fight and got off the phone.  I figured it would be better to have a record of what they were saying if I needed to prove it in court.  So, I resent the estimate to them.  I had to sent it close to six times before they acknowledged it.  By this time I had filed a complaint with the Department of Insurance.

The Department of Insurance doesn't really do anything.  However, the insurance company can face a fine if they do not respond to the complaint within a certain period of time, and it does get other people involved with your case.

Finally, after months of stalling, they made an offer based on the original estimate.  They offered $1,451.63 after I emailed them that I was going to take this to small claims court.  Their low-ball offer was about $1,000 lower than the estimate.  They even lied (in writing this time) saying, "I have issued payment for the damage."  The check never arrived, and I would not have accepted it anyway.  I felt I had enough ammo for court.

It took 4 months of calls and emails for nothing.  When I threatened to sue, I got an offer.  After I filed the case, they were willing to settle.

One of the concerns I had was how to get Progressive and not the insured.  But you have to sue the insured in small claims court, and the insurance company will provide an attorney and pay the judgement.  I kept the insured informed about how I was being treated and the suit.  He was not happy, but he was willing to call Progressive and push them to settle.

I had one more chance to remove Progressive out of the loop and get my money when Judge Mathis contacted us.  I was willing to drop the small claims case and get a free trip to Chicago to be on TV, but, unfortunately, the defendant has to agree.

See image on blog

My preparation for trial was to watch A Few Good Men and Pawn Stars.  You can have representation in small claims if the defendant has an attorney, but I couldn't find an attorney willing to take my case pro bono.  So, I was just going to use what I learned about negotiation from Pawn Stars to settle before the trial.

I had filed the case for $6,890.01 by throwing in lost wages, interest, and punitive damages.  The limit for small claims cases in Colorado is $7,500.  I figured that would scare them and give me plenty of room to negotiate.  I don't think it worked.  Progressive has probably been sued a lot and knows what they are likely to lose.

The Progressive attorney contacted me the day before the trial with a revised offer.  It wasn't much higher.  So, we went to court.  The judge gives you one more chance to settle before starting trial.  I decided $3,000 was my bottom line, but Progressive wouldn't go any higher than $2,200.  I was still so mad at them that it was worth the risk to have the judge decide.

The verdict was $2,914.57.  I was pretty close and may have been right on the money except that I only got 2 estimates for the damage and the judge used the low, Progressive estimate as the third to make an average.

While things went well for me, I realized going to court is a risk.  The court can be backed up and have a back-log of cases.  Sometimes the wheels of justice grind slow.  The judges can pretty much do whatever they want.  Sometimes you get a just judge, sometimes not.

Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison.

Matthew 5:25 (KJV)

[End Rant]

And now, back to an actual chess game.

LM Gunnar Andersen got the Game Of The Year thanks to good timing and an old policy I created to punish one of my chess villains.  I am the Dark Knight of Colorado Springs chess.  When the bat-signal shines bright on Tuesday night, I must swoop in and prevent any crime.

Years ago, the Penguin🐧tormented the citizens of Colorado Springs.  I banished him to Arkham asylum and offered any citizen the right to have their victory over Penguin moved to the top of the publish list.  The citizens rejoiced with the return of safety and sportsmanship.

However, the peace was short-lived when the Riddler︖ tried to wreak havoc.  The ingenious use of the bat-camera scared the Riddler︖ into hiding.  Tranquility returned to the club until the Joker's🃏cackling laughter sent shivers up the spines of everyone in the tournament hall.  Again, the Dark Knight was able to restore order.

One at a time, the villains were little match for the Caped Crusader.  Unfortunately, there has been a jailbreak and the inmates have escaped: the Penguin🐧, the Riddler︖, and the Joker🃏 are on the loose!

With LM Gunnar Andersen's new Speed crown and his ability to win chess games at lightning speed, I chose one of his quick wins as the Game Of The Year.  I call it:

The Flash🗲 vs The Penguin🐧
See diagram on blog
Black to move

Game Of The Year XVI


[Event "IHOP QUICK SEPTEMBER"]
[Site "https://cschessnews.blogspot.com/"]
[Date "2019.09.15"]
[Round "2.1"]
[White "Whinemiller"]
[Black "Andersen, Gunnar"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "B00"]
[WhiteElo "1793"]
[BlackElo "2124"]
[PlyCount "34"]
[EventDate "2019.09.15"]
[TimeControl "1440+5"]

1. e4 Na6 2. d4 c6 3. Nc3 d5 4. Nf3 dxe4 5. Nxe4 Bf5 6. Ng3 Bg6 7. Bc4 Nb4 8. Bb3 Nf6 9. O-O e6 10. a3 Nbd5 11. c4 Nb6 12. Re1 Be7 13. Be3 O-O 14. Rc1 Qc7 15. d5 Rad8 16. Bxb6 Qxb6 17. Nd4 Bc5 0-1

https://www.chessvideos.tv/chess-game-replayer.php?id=115314


The Last Week In Chess


On March 10th, the Colorado Springs Chess Club held the 2nd round of the March Swiss 90 (5SS, G/90+30).  Then the Coronavirus hit!  And life has never been the same.

Standings. March Swiss 90

# Name Rtng Rd 1 Rd 2 Tot Prize

1 Paul D Anderson 1957 W6 W4 2.0
2 Gunnar Andersen 2292 W5 D3 1.5
3 Mitchell Anderson 1969 W7 D2 1.5
4 Mark McGough 1805 W9 L1 1.0
5 Grayson Ed Harris 1599 L2 W8 1.0
6 Gabriel Frank 1350 L1 D7 0.5
7 Dean W Brown 1442 L3 D6 0.5
8 Derek Eskeldson 1368 H--- L5 0.5
9 Clinton Eads 1241 L4 H--- 0.5

Monday, July 22, 2019

P Is For Pin VIII

Game Of The Week


A couple years back, I came up with a method to organize chess tactics.  I called it the DROP Method (https://cschessnews.blogspot.com/2012/03/drop-method.html).  The DROP method is an acronym for the basic kinds of tactics.  It is meant to remind you not to drop your pieces and help you get your opponent to drop theirs.

I said that the DROP Method was a work in progress, and it was.  So, I thought I would revisit each of the four kinds of chess tactics to provide more examples.  The first kind of tactic in the DROP Method is Discovery, which I revisited on April 8th (https://cschessnews.blogspot.com/2019/04/d-is-for-discovery-vii.html).  The second kind of tactic in the DROP Method is Removal, which I revisited on May 14th (https://cschessnews.blogspot.com/2019/05/r-is-for-removal-viii.html).  The third kind of tactic in the DROP Method is Overload, which I revisited on May 29th (https://cschessnews.blogspot.com/2019/05/o-is-for-overload-viii.html).

The fourth kind of tactic in the DROP Method is Pin.

Pin is a chess move that immobilizes an opponent's piece.

The Pin is different from the other kinds of tactics in that it does not create multiple threats.  Its main function is to prevent a piece from moving.  A Pin on a target allows that target to be attacked by a lower value piece.  A Pin on a support allows the capture of the piece the support is guarding.

"The defensive power of a pinned piece is only imaginary."

Aaron Nimzovich

The Pin works by threatening a low value piece that has a higher value piece (or an ungarded piece) behind it.  The low value piece is stuck (as if with a pin) to the higher value piece due to the loss of material should the low value piece move and allow the capture of the higher value piece.

If the higher value piece is the King, the low value piece is absolutely immobilized, as the rules of Chess do not allow moves where the King could be captured.  Otherwise the Pin is relative, as the opponent can actually move the low value piece if he is willing to accept the loss of material.  The other types of Pins are rare:

  • Absolute (Pins a target to the King)
  • Relative (Pins a low value target to a higher value piece)
  • Cross (Multiple Pins on one piece)
  • Cross-check (blocks check and counter-checks)

Here is an example from the Colorado Springs Chess Club's Tuesday night event:  July Mating Game.  Alex Bozhenov created the best example of a Pin in his game with Joel Brown this night.  While the Black Pawns on the 3rd rank make this position dominating for Black, taking advantage of the Pin on g2 is by far the best move.

See diagram on blog
Black to move

P Is For Pin VIII


[Event "July Mating Game"]
[Site "https://cschessnews.blogspot.com/"]
[Date "2019.07.16"]
[Round "2.1"]
[White "Brown, Joel"]
[Black "Bozhenov, Alex"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "B07"]
[WhiteElo "1378"]
[BlackElo "1971"]
[PlyCount "74"]
[EventDate "2019.07.16"]
[TimeControl "2700"]

1. e4 d6 2. Bc4 Nf6 3. Nc3 g6 4. d4 Bg7 5. h3 Nxe4 6. Bxf7+ Kxf7 7. Nxe4 Rf8 8. Nf3 Kg8 9. Be3 Nc6 10. Qd2 Bf5 11. Ng3 e5 12. Bg5 Qe8 13. d5 e4 14. Nh2 Ne5 15. Qe2 Nf7 16. Bc1 Qe5 17. c4 c6 18. dxc6 bxc6 19. Nxf5 gxf5 20. O-O d5 21. cxd5 cxd5 22. Rb1 d4 23. b4 d3 24. Qd1 Qd5 25. a4 Rac8 26. Be3 Rc7 27. Bc5 Re8 28. Re1 Rd7 29. Rb3 Re6 30. Nf1 f4 31. Nh2 Rg6 32. Nf3 Bf6 33. Nh2 e3 34. Nf3 e2 35. Rxd3 Qxd3 36. Qxd3 Rxd3 37. Rxe2 Nd6 0-1

https://www.chessvideos.tv/chess-game-replayer.php?id=114553



This Week In Chess


On July 16th, the Colorado Springs Chess Club started the July Mating Game (4SS, G/45;d/10).

Standings. July Mating Game

# Name Rtng Rd 1 Rd 2 Tot Prize

1 Aleksand Bozhenov 1971 W8 W3 2.0
2 Grayson Ed Harris 1646 W7 W4 2.0
3 Joel N Brown 1378 W5 L1 1.0
4 Jonathan An Brown unr. W6 L2 1.0
5 Mark McGough 1824 L3 W8 1.0
6 Christophe Motley 1690 L4 W7 1.0
7 Richard Buchanan 2000 L2 L6 0.0
8 Dean W Brown 1459 L1 L5 0.0

Wednesday, April 24, 2019

Bobby Has Left The Springs

Game Of The Week


One of the biggest chess controversies in Colorado Springs is whether or not Bobby Fischer ever played here.  On one side is the 1st Colorado Springs City Chess Champion (Francis Mason).  On the other side is the 22nd Colorado Springs City Chess Champion (NM Buck Buchanan).

Francis Mason claims to have played Bobby Fischer when he came to Colorado Springs.  As he was sharing the game of Kings with his son, Curtis Mason, he included his encounter with the King of Kings in his chess war stories.  Of course, Curtis passed along this information with any chess player who was willing to listen.

"No!" Buck shook his head gruffly.  "Never happened.  Bobby has never been to Colorado Springs."

Now, on the 55th anniversary, new evidence has appeared that proves once and for all that Bobby Fischer was in Colorado Springs in 1964.

This article appeared on page 1 of the Colorado Springs Gazette Telegraph from September 2nd, 1972 and recounts the events of the 1964 Bobby Fischer Simul at the Broadmoor.

See image on blog

"Juan, President of the Colorado Springs Chess Club for many years, was ranked as one of the strongest players in Colorado.

In the Fischer-Reid game below, players will note that Reid was a pawn up and in a strong position at move thirty.  But he believed that Bobby's vast experience would beat him in the end game and so he offered a draw.  The international grandmaster accepted instantly, with a grin."

Marshall Sprague, Colorado Springs Sun

See image on blog

See diagram on blog
White to move

Bobby Has Left The Springs


[Event "1964 Broadmoor Simul"]
[Site "https://cschessnews.blogspot.com/"]
[Date "1964.04.28"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Fischer, Bobby"]
[Black "Reid, Juan"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "C41"]
[PlyCount "60"]
[EventDate "1964.04.28"]
[TimeControl "0"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 Nf6 4. Nc3 exd4 5. Nxd4 Be7 6. f3 Nbd7 7. Be3 Ne5 8. Qd2 c5 9. Bb5+ Bd7 10. Nf5 O-O 11. Bxd7 Qxd7 12. O-O-O Nc4 13. Qe2 Nxe3 14. Qxe3 Rfd8 15. g4 Bf8 16. e5 Ne8 17. Ne4 Qc7 18. exd6 Nxd6 19. Nexd6 Bxd6 20. Nxd6 Rxd6 21. Rxd6 Qxd6 22. Rd1 Qxh2 23. Qe7 Qb8 24. Rd7 Qf4+ 25. Kb1 g6 26. Qe2 b6 27. a3 a6 28. Qd3 b5 29. Qd5 Re8 30. Ka2 Re5 1/2-1/2

https://www.chessvideos.tv/chess-game-replayer.php?id=114257


This Week In Chess


On April 23rd, the Colorado Springs Chess Club finished the April Quick Six event (6SS, G/24+5).

Standings. April Quick Six

# Name Rtng Rd 1 Rd 2 Rd 3 Rd 4 Rd 5 Rd 6 Tot Prize

1 Gunnar Andersen 2102 W13 W7 W3 W8 D2 W4 5.5 $37.00 1st
2 Aleksand Bozhenov 1891 L9 W5 W8 W3 D1 W7 4.5 $25.00 2nd
3 Paul D Anderson 1939 W6 W4 L1 L2 W9 W8 4.0
4 Mitchell Anderson 1887 W12 L3 W13 W7 W5 L1 4.0
5 Brian Jo Rountree 1669 H--- L2 W11 W9 L4 W13 3.5
6 Joel Brown 1334 L3 W12 L7 D10 W15 W11 3.5 $16.00 U1500
7 Mark McGough 1722 W11 L1 W6 L4 W12 L2 3.0
8 Earle P Wikle 1888 W15 W9 L2 L1 W10 L3 3.0
9 Ayush Vispute 1228 W2 L8 W14 L5 L3 W12 3.0
10 Christophe Motley 1526 H--- H--- H--- D6 L8 W15 3.0
11 Jonathan Brown unr. L7 D14 L5 W15 W13 L6 2.5 $5.00 GOW
12 Grayson Ed Harris 1007 L4 L6 W15 W13 L7 L9 2.0
13 Dean W Brown 1400 L1 W15 L4 L12 L11 L5 1.0
14 William Leo Wolf 1311 U--- D11 L9 U--- U--- U--- 0.5
15 Clinton Eads 1027 L8 L13 L12 L11 L6 L10 0.0

Wednesday, April 3, 2019

The Scandinavian

Game Of The Week


This week's game comes from the March Swiss 90, round 4.  It was played by Alex Bozhenov and Jesse Williams.  They have played 36 times before.  27 in the past year!  They are on pace to break my personal best of 87 USCF-rated games against Mark McGough.

This time Jesse tried the Scandinavian Defense: 1.e4 d5

I can't remember ever playing this opening myself.  However, I am curious about trying it, as I am 1/4th Swedish and 1/8th Norwegian (37.5% Scandinavian).  Also, my son just took a genetic test and found out he is 20.6% Scandinavian.

I have played the English, but if there are other openings you think I should try, let me know.  Here are my genetic proclivities:

  • 3/8th German
  • 1/4th Swedish
  • 3/16th English
  • 1/8th Norwegian
  • 1/16th Irish (just a wee bit Irish)

I am guessing that Jesse has very little Scandinavian DNA, as he did little justice to this defense against Bozhenov's attack.  It was like the Russians pulling the Swedish King out of Finland in 1809.

See diagram on blog
White to move

The Scandinavian


[Event "March Swiss 90"]
[Site "https://cschessnews.blogspot.com/"]
[Date "2019.03.26"]
[Round "4.2"]
[White "Bozhenov, Alex"]
[Black "Williams, Jesse"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B01"]
[WhiteElo "1980"]
[BlackElo "1731"]
[PlyCount "37"]
[EventDate "2019.03.05"]
[TimeControl "5400+30"]

1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Qxd5 3. Nc3 Qd8 4. d4 Bf5 5. Nf3 Nf6 6. Bc4 e6 7. O-O Be7 8. Bb3 a6 9. Ne5 Nbd7 10. Qf3 c6 11. Nxf7 Bg4 12. Nxd8 Bxf3 13. Nxe6 Bd5 14. Nc7+ Kd8 15. N3xd5 cxd5 16. Nxd5 Rc8 17. Nxe7 Kxe7 18. Re1+ Kd8 19. Bf4 1-0

https://www.chessvideos.tv/chess-game-replayer.php?id=114150



This Week In Chess


On March 26th, the Colorado Springs Chess Club finished its March Swiss 90 (4SS, G90+30).

Standings. March Swiss 90

# Name Rtng Rd 1 Rd 2 Rd 3 Rd 4 Tot Prize

1 Paul D Anderson 1985 W10 D4 W5 D3 3.0 $19.00 1st
2 Aleksand Bozhenov 1980 W12 L5 W4 W8 3.0 $19.00 1st
3 Brian Jo Rountree 1869 W13 H--- W8 D1 3.0 $19.00 1st
4 Christophe Motley 1599 W11 D1 L2 W10 2.5
5 Josh S Bloomer 2323 W9 W2 L1 U--- 2.0
6 Grayson Ed Harris 1490 W14 L8 W7 U--- 2.0 $15.00 u1500 + $5.00 GOW
7 Mark McGough 1863 H--- H--- L6 W12 2.0
8 Jesse Williams 1731 H--- W6 L3 L2 1.5
9 Ross Inman 1481 L5 D12 W11 U--- 1.5
10 Dean W Brown 1444 L1 L11 W12 L4 1.0 $5.00 GOW
11 Scott Ch Williams 1225 L4 W10 L9 U--- 1.0 $5.00 GOW
12 Gerald Mena 1362 L2 D9 L10 L7 0.5
13 Clinton Eads 1307 L3 H--- U--- U--- 0.5
14 Nick A Curott 1161 L6 U--- U--- U--- 0.0

Monday, August 27, 2018

Parable Of The Good Chess Player

Game Of The Week


Good evening, my fellow chess players.

One month and five days ago, in a moment of tragedy and trauma, the duties of this office fell upon me.  I asked then for your help, and God’s that we might continue Colorado chess on its course binding up our wounds, healing our history, moving forward in new unity to clear the chess agenda and to keep the chess commitment for all of our players.  United we have kept that commitment.  And united we have enlarged that commitment.  And through all time to come, I think chess will be a stronger sport, a more just activity, a hobby of greater opportunity and fulfilment because of what we have all done together in this month of unparalleled achievement:

1. I have written a new chess parable:

A tournament director (TD) was going down from Colorado Springs to St. Louis, when he was attacked by a disgruntled chess player.  She stripped him of his clothes and beat him with a club!!  A Monk happened to be going down the same road, and when he saw the TD, he passed by on the other side.  So too, a Secretary in the Army, when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side.  But a Good Chess Player, as he traveled, came where the TD was; and when he saw him, he took pity on him.  He went to him and bandaged his wounds, pouring on oil and wine.  Then he put the TD on his own donkey, brought him to the 2018 Sinquefield Cup and took care of him.  The next day the TD had recovered.  ‘What!!?,’ he said, ‘you're not going to pay the entry fee too!!?’

2. I have created a new chess variant:

Covington Random Chess

  • No rules about how the pieces are set up
  • No rules about how the pieces move & capture
  • Winner is determined by who resigns first
  • Any dispute is settled by the TD claiming both players are wrong and punishing no one
  • All prizes are $3.00

3. I have found this new chess tactic:

See diagram on blog
White to move

With chess players in the clubs far away, with chess players’ future under challenge right here at home, with our hopes and the world’s hopes for peace in the balance every day, I do not believe that I should devote an hour or a day of my time to any personal partisan causes or to any duties other than the awesome duties of this office:  the vice presidency of your association.

Accordingly, I shall not seek, and I will not accept, the nomination of my association for another term as your Vice President.

Thank you for listening.  Good night and God bless all of you.

Parable Of The Good Chess Player


[Event "August Swiss 90"]
[Site "https://cschessnews.blogspot.com/"]
[Site "Colorado Springs"]
[Date "2018.08.21"]
[Round "3.3"]
[White "Parker, Justin"]
[Black "Bridle, Sam"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B08"]
[WhiteElo "1"]
[BlackElo "1826"]
[PlyCount "75"]
[EventDate "2018.08.07"]
[TimeControl "5400+30"]

1. e4 Nc6 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 Nf6 4. Nc3 g6 5. Bc4 Bg7 6. Bg5 h6 7. Bh4 O-O 8. O-O g5 9. Bg3 Bg4 10. Be2 Nh5 11. Ne1 Nxg3 12. hxg3 Bxe2 13. Nxe2 f5 14. c3 Kh8 15. d5 Ne5 16. exf5 c5 17. dxc6 Nxc6 18. g4 Qb6 19. Nf3 Ne5 20. Ned4 Nxg4 21. Nxg5 Nf6 22. Nge6 Rf7 23. Qe2 Kh7 24. Rad1 Rg8 25. Rd3 Bf8 26. Rh3 Qa5 27. Qe3 Ng4 28. Qf4 Qe5 29. Ng5+ Rxg5 30. Qxg5 Qg7 31. Ne6 Qg8 32. f3 Ne5 33. Kf2 Rf6 34. f4 Nd7 35. Qg3 Rxf5 36. Nxf8+ Qxf8 37. Qd3 Kg6 38. g4 1-0

https://www.chessvideos.tv/chess-game-replayer.php?id=113053


This Week In Chess


On August 21st, the Colorado Springs Chess Club continued the August Swiss 90 (4SS, G/90+30).

Standings. August Swiss 90

# Name Rtng Rd 1 Rd 2 Rd 3 Tot Prize

1 Paul D Anderson 1989 W13 W2 W6 3.0
2 Brian Jo Rountree 1893 W11 L1 W7 2.0
3 Ayush Vispute 1362 L9 W8 W12 2.0
4 Justin Parker unr. L7 W14 W10 2.0
5 Peter Barlay 1931 W14 D6 U--- 1.5
6 Mark McGough 1855 W12 D5 L1 1.5
7 Michael Smith II 1635 W4 D10 L2 1.5
8 Scott Ch Williams 1246 H--- L3 W14 1.5
9 Laurence Rob Wutt 1948 W3 U--- U--- 1.0
10 Sam Bridle 1826 H--- D7 L4 1.0
11 Joey Arispe 1140 L2 D12 U--- 0.5
12 Grayson Ed Harris 1111 L6 D11 L3 0.5
13 William Leo Wolf 1515 L1 U--- U--- 0.0
14 Clinton D Eads 1268 L5 L4 L8 0.0

Monday, July 30, 2018

P Is For Pin VII

Game Of The Week


A couple years back, I came up with a method to organize chess tactics.  I called it the DROP Method (https://cschessnews.blogspot.com/2012/03/drop-method.html).  The DROP method is an acronym for the basic kinds of tactics.  It is meant to remind you not to drop your pieces and help you get your opponent to drop theirs.

I said that the DROP Method was a work in progress, and it was.  So, I thought I would revisit each of the four kinds of chess tactics to provide more examples.  The first kind of tactic in the DROP Method is Discovery, which I revisited on April 10th (https://cschessnews.blogspot.com/2018/04/d-is-for-discovery-vi.html).  The second kind of tactic in the DROP Method is Removal, which I revisited on May 14th (https://cschessnews.blogspot.com/2018/05/r-is-for-removal-vii.html).  The third kind of tactic in the DROP Method is Overload, which I revisited on June 18th (https://cschessnews.blogspot.com/2018/06/o-is-for-overload-vii.html).

The fourth kind of tactic in the DROP Method is Pin.

Pin is a chess move that immobilizes an opponent's piece.

The Pin is different from the other kinds of tactics in that it does not create multiple threats.  Its main function is to prevent a piece from moving.  A Pin on a target allows that target to be attacked by a lower value piece.  A Pin on a support allows the capture of the piece the support is guarding.

"The defensive power of a pinned piece is only imaginary."

Aaron Nimzovich

The Pin works by threatening a low value piece that has a higher value piece (or an ungarded piece) behind it.  The low value piece is stuck (as if with a pin) to the higher value piece due to the loss of material should the low value piece move and allow the capture of the higher value piece.

If the higher value piece is the King, the low value piece is absolutely immobilized, as the rules of Chess do not allow moves where the King could be captured.  Otherwise the Pin is relative, as the opponent can actually move the low value piece if he is willing to accept the loss of material.  The other types of Pins are rare:

  • Absolute (Pins a target to the King)
  • Relative (Pins a low value target to a higher value piece)
  • Cross (Multiple Pins on one piece)
  • Cross-check (blocks check and counter-checks)

Here is an example from the Colorado Springs Chess Club's Tuesday night event:  July Mating Game. Erasmus Eskeldson, who is closing in on his 50th standard-rated tournament game, got his Bishop pinned to his Queen.

However, Erasmus realized that a Pin against the Queen is not Absolute.  It is a Relative Pin.  The pinned piece can move, and, in this case, it can create a Discovery to get out of the Pin and win material!

See diagram on blog
Black to move

P Is For Pin VII


[Event "July Mating Game"]
[Site "https://cschessnews.blogspot.com/"]
[Date "2018.07.24"]
[Round "3.3"]
[White "Arispe, Joey"]
[Black "Eskeldson, Erasmus"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "D00"]
[WhiteElo "1216"]
[BlackElo "1341"]
[PlyCount "64"]
[EventDate "2018.07.17"]
[TimeControl "2700"]

1. d4 d5 2. Bf4 Nf6 3. c3 e6 4. Nf3 c5 5. h3 Nbd7 6. e3 g6 7. Bd3 Bg7 8. O-O O-O 9. Nbd2 b6 10. Qc2 Bb7 11. Rfe1 Nb8 12. b3 Na6 13. Rad1 Rc8 14. Qb1 Nd7 15. e4 cxd4 16. cxd4 Nb4 17. Bd6 Nxd3 18. Qxd3 dxe4 19. Nxe4 Re8 20. Bh2 Bxe4 21. Qxe4 Nf6 22. Qb7 Re7 23. Qa6 Nd5 24. a3 Rd7 25. Ne5 Rdc7 26. Nc4 Re7 27. Bd6 Rd7 28. Bh2 Nc7 29. Qxa7 Bxd4 30. Nd6 Rxd6 31. Bxd6 Qxd6 32. Re4 Bxf2+ 0-1

https://www.chessvideos.tv/chess-game-replayer.php?id=112942



This Week In Chess


On July 24th, the Colorado Springs Chess Club finished the July Mating Game (4SS, G/45;d/10).

Standings. July Mating Game

# Name Rtng Rd 1 Rd 2 Rd 3 Rd 4 Tot Prize

1 Aleksand Bozhenov 1999 W10 W9 W2 W4 4.0 $37.00 1st
2 Mark McGough 1791 W11 W5 L1 W6 3.0 $25.00 2nd
3 Lawrence R Osborn 949 H--- U--- W8 W5 2.5 $16.00 U1300/unr
4 Michael Smith II 1642 L6 W7 W10 L1 2.0
5 Erasmus Eskeldson 1341 W7 L2 W6 L3 2.0 $5.00 GOW
6 Joey Arispe 1216 W4 W11 L5 L2 2.0 $5.00 GOW
7 Ross Inman unr. L5 L4 W11 W10 2.0
8 David Argaez unr. H--- U--- L3 W11 1.5
9 William Leo Wolf 1552 W12 L1 U--- U--- 1.0
10 Nick J Derosier 1312 L1 W12 L4 L7 1.0
11 Scott Ch Williams 1254 L2 L6 L7 L8 0.0
12 Braiden Denny 381 L9 L10 U--- U--- 0.0

Tuesday, July 17, 2018

Theoretical vs Practical

Game Of The Week

By Matt Grinberg


You probably think the title is a reference to theoretical chess versus practical chess.  Actually, I mean the theoretical physicist, Albert Einstein, developer of the theories of special and general relativity, versus the more practical physicist, Robert Oppenheimer, who was the scientist who directed the development of the atomic bomb with the Manhattan Project in Los Alamos, New Mexico.

There is a chess game they played against each other in 1933 at Princeton University where Einstein had taken a position after leaving Germany.  It is known that Einstein played chess.  In fact, he was friends with Emanuel Lasker.

It is not known for sure whether or not Oppenheimer had an interest in chess.  The following is one of only two games known played by Einstein, and it is the only game known played by Oppenheimer.  There is some question as to the authenticity of this game.  Some claim that White was actually Hans Einstein, Albert's son, and the location was the University of California, Berkeley, where he and Oppenheimer were both professors in the late 1940's.  Others claim that Black was really Max Oppenheimer, the artist.

On the other hand, nobody has proved that the game was not played by Albert Einstein against Robert Oppenheimer.  So, here it is - the theoretical physicist versus the practical physicist.

Einstein, Albert vs Oppenheimer, Robert – 1-0
Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, 1933
Ruy Lopez

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4

Einstein is definitely following theory. 4... b5  This is not bad, but it is a bit unusual.  Perhaps Oppenheimer is taking a practical approach by avoiding theory?

[The theoretical line is the Closed Ruy Lopez. 4... Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. c3 O-O 9. h3 White has a small edge]

5. Bb3 Nf6 6. O-O

[White could also try 6. Ng5 like a Two Knights Defense.  6... d5 7. exd5 Nd4! (Not 7... Nxd5? 8. Nxf7! like the Fried Liver Variation of the Two Knights, but better. 8... Kxf7 9. Qf3 Ke6 10. Nc3 Nce7 (10... Ncb4?! as in the Fried Liver Variation is useless here because White's bishop defends c2. 11. a3 Black is forced to return the knight) 11. d4 Bb7 12. Bg5 c6 13. O-O-O Black's king will die before it ever finds an escape) 8. O-O Nxb3 9. axb3 h6 10. Nf3 Bg4 11. d3 Qxd5=]

6... Nxe4!?

This definitely takes the game out of theoretical lines.  Taking the pawn with Black's king uncastled and White ready to play Re1 is risky.

[6... Be7 7. Re1 d6 8. c3 O-O 9. h3 transposes again to the Closed Ruy Lopez]

7. Re1

[7. d4 d5 8. dxe5 Be6 9. c3 transposes to the Open Defense of the Ruy Lopez]

7... d5 8. a4N?

A novelty and Einstein's only bad move of the game.

[8. Nc3 worked nicely in the following game. 8... Nxc3 9. dxc3 Be6 10. a4 Rb8? (10... b4 11. Nxe5 Nxe5 12. Rxe5 White is better) 11. axb5 axb5 12. Ra6 Qd7 13. Rxc6 Qxc6 14. Nxe5 Qc5 15. Nxf7 Kxf7 16. Qf3 Ke7 17. Bxd5 Rb6 18. Bg5 Kd7 19. Bxe6 Rxe6 20. Qf7 Re7 21. Bxe7 Bxe7 22. Qe6 1-0, Esserman, Marc (USA) 2394 - Simpson, Ronald (USA) 2304 , Internet 9/ 8/2009 US Chess League]

8... b4?

Oppenheimer is so worried about what Einstein is up to with a4, that he misses his one chance of the game.

[White is embarrassed after 8... Bc5! 9. Re2 Nxf2 10. Rxf2 Bxf2 11. Kxf2 e4 12. Qe2 O-O 13. Ne1 Material is even, but White's pieces are bottled up and his king is exposed. Black should win]

9. d3 Nc5?

Oppenheimer begins his slide into oblivion.

[The knight is needed for defense. 9... Nf6 10. Bf4 Be7 11. Nxe5 Nxe5 12. Bxe5 O-O 13. Nd2 Be6=]

10. Nxe5 Ne7

[Or 10... Nxe5 11. Rxe5 Be6 12. Bxd5 when White is a pawn up]

11. Qf3 f6??

It is tempting to stop mate and at the same time counter attack against White's knight, but this is very bad because it exposes Black's king on the h5-e8 diagonal.

[11... Be6 12. Nd2 White is better, but Black still has good chances]

See diagram on blog
White to move

12. Qh5! g6

Evidently Oppenheimer thought this would refute Einstein's attack because now he is threatening two of Einstein's pieces.  But he overlooked that the knight on e7 and the h-pawn are both pinned.

13. Nxg6! hxg6 14. Qxh8 Nxb3 15. cxb3 Qd6??

A second horrific blunder, effectively ending the game.

[After 15... Kf7 16. Qh7 Bg7 17. Bh6 Nf5 Black is down an exchange for nothing, but still has some chances]

16. Bh6 Kd7

There is no way to save the bishop.

17. Bxf8 Bb7 18. Qg7 Re8 19. Nd2 c5 20. Rad1 a5

21. Nc4!

A nice way to wind up the game.  Black has no way to hold e7 and save his queen.  His position falls apart. 21... dxc4 22. dxc4 Qxd1 23. Rxd1 Kc8 24. Bxe7 Black resigns. [1:0]

Theoretical vs Practical


[Event "Princeton University"]
[Site "https://cschessnews.blogspot.com/"]
[Date "1933.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Einstein, Albert"]
[Black "Oppenheimer, Robert"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C78"]
[PlyCount "47"]
[EventDate "1933.??.??"]
[TimeControl "0"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 b5 5. Bb3 Nf6 6. O-O Nxe4 7. Re1 d5 8. a4 b4 9. d3 Nc5 10. Nxe5 Ne7 11. Qf3 f6 12. Qh5+ g6 13. Nxg6 hxg6 14. Qxh8 Nxb3 15. cxb3 Qd6 16. Bh6 Kd7 17. Bxf8 Bb7 18. Qg7 Re8 19. Nd2 c5 20. Rad1 a5 21. Nc4 dxc4 22. dxc4 Qxd1 23. Rxd1+ Kc8 24. Bxe7 1-0

https://www.chessvideos.tv/chess-game-replayer.php?id=112872


This Week In Chess


On July 10th, the Colorado Springs Chess Club finished the July Quick Six event (6SS, G/24+5).

Standings. July Quick Six

# Name Rtng Rd 1 Rd 2 Rd 3 Rd 4 Rd 5 Rd 6 Tot Prize

1 Aleksand Bozhenov 1789 W10 L4 W7 W2 W8 W9 5.0 $43.00 1st
2 Earle P Wikle 1933 W16 W13 W6 L1 W10 L3 4.0 $14.00 2nd
3 Paul D Anderson 1893 H--- W12 H--- U--- W7 W2 4.0 $14.00 2nd
4 Josh S Bloomer 2209 W7 W1 W11 U--- U--- U--- 3.0
5 Sara Herman 1848 W12 W17 W16 U--- U--- U--- 3.0
6 Jeffrey Fox 1813 W8 L11 L2 L7 W12 W10 3.0
7 Brian Jo Rountree 1703 L4 W8 L1 W6 L3 W14 3.0 $16.00 U1750
8 Gerardo Cruz 1113 L6 L7 W18 W12 L1 W15 3.0 $16.00 U1750
9 Mark McGough 1713 H--- U--- U--- W15 W14 L1 2.5
10 Tristan Cruz 708 L1 D15 W17 X13 L2 L6 2.5
11 Daniel Herman 1969 W15 W6 L4 U--- U--- U--- 2.0
12 Derek Eskeldson 1221 L5 L3 W15 L8 L6 W17 2.0
13 Laurence Rob Wutt 1769 W18 L2 H--- F10 U--- U--- 1.5
14 Michael Smith II 1567 H--- U--- U--- W17 L9 L7 1.5
15 Dean W Brown 1400 L11 D10 L12 L9 W17 L8 1.5
16 Joey Arispe 1279 L2 W18 L5 U--- U--- U--- 1.0
17 Lawrence R Osborn 961 H--- L5 L10 L14 L15 L12 0.5
18 Shaun Pat Creamer 559 L13 L16 L8 U--- U--- U--- 0.0

Monday, April 30, 2018

What's Your Name

Game Of The Week


This week's game comes from Mike Smith II.  His name is so common that he needs a number to set himself apart.  Mike joined the Colorado Springs Chess Club in 2017 and started with a 1255 rating.  He quickly shot up 400 rating points as he adjusted to tournament chess.  However, he has been up and down ever since.

At the Cabin Fever Reliever, the story stayed the same.

See image on blog

He was supreme in his first two rounds, with 2 wins.  Then he landed on board 1 against NM Buck Buchanan.  He had already beaten Buck in the City Championship last year and had his best shot to earn his inaugural 1st place.

However, the down side was about to rear its ugly head again.  Mike crashed and burned in the next 2 games, with 2 devastating losses.  It was so bad he talked about changing his name.

Of couse, it is not unusual for chess players to change their name.  Most chess players have done so, at one time or another, for various reasons.  In fact, every player who played in the 2018 Colorado Closed Championship this year had already changed their name.

See image on blog
Colorado Closed, Round 1 - NM Lior Lapid vs CM Kevin Seidler

2018 Colorado Closed Championship

Place, Score, Name, Original Name

1st 4.0 NM Lior Lapid - Lior Smith
2nd 3.5 IM Michael Mulyar - Michael Johnson
2nd 3.5 FM Nikhilesh Kunche - Nikhilesh Williams
4th 2.0 NM Gunnar Andersen - Gunnar Anderson
4th 2.0 LM Richard Shtivelband - Richard Brown
5th 0.0 CM Kevin Seidler - Kevin Jones

So, it is understandable that Mike would want to change his name.  Who would want to be associated with this position.  This is the Jeff Gillooly of chess positions.  Coincidentally, Jeff Gillooly changed his name to Mike Smith III.

See diagram on blog
Black to move

What's Your Name


[Event "Cabin Fever Reliever"]
[Site "https://cschessnews.blogspot.com/"]
[Date "2018.04.24"]
[Round "3.1"]
[White "Smith, Mike"]
[Black "Buchanan, Richard"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C44"]
[WhiteElo "1641"]
[BlackElo "2010"]
[PlyCount "70"]
[EventDate "2018.04.17"]
[TimeControl "2700"]

1. e4 e5 2. d4 exd4 3. Nf3 Nc6 4. Bc4 Bc5 5. c3 d3 6. Qxd3 d6 7. b4 Bb6 8. b5 Nce7 9. Bb3 Nf6 10. Bb2 O-O 11. O-O Ng6 12. c4 Nf4 13. Qd2 Ne6 14. Nc3 Nc5 15. Bc2 Be6 16. Qe2 Re8 17. Rad1 Qc8 18. Ng5 Bg4 19. Nf3 Qe6 20. Rfe1 Ncd7 21. Qd3 Bxf3 22. gxf3 Ne5 23. Qe2 Qh3 24. Rd3 Nxd3 25. Bxd3 Re5 26. Bc1 Ba5 27. Qe3 Rh5 28. Bb1 Qxh2+ 29. Kf1 Qh1+ 30. Ke2 Qg2 31. c5 Rxc5 32. Bd2 Re8 33. Rf1 Bxc3 34. Bxc3 Nd5 35. Qd3 Nf4+ 0-1

https://www.chessvideos.tv/chess-game-replayer.php?id=112602


This Week In Chess


On April 24th, the Colorado Springs Chess Club finished the Cabin Fever Reliever event (4SS, G/45d10).

Standings. Cabin Fever Reliever

# Name Rtng Rd 1 Rd 2 Rd 3 Rd 4 Tot Prize

1 Richard Buchanan 2010 W9 W2 W3 W4 4.0 $26.00 1st
2 Mark McGough 1795 W7 L1 W5 W3 3.0 $17.00 2nd
3 Michael Smith II 1641 W10 W4 L1 L2 2.0
4 Supreme King 1972 W5 L3 W8 L1 2.0
5 Gilber Gaxiola Jr 1317 L4 W10 L2 W7 2.0 $11.00 U1500
6 Paul D Anderson 2039 H--- H--- U--- W10 2.0
7 Ayush Pan Vispute 1179 L2 D9 W10 L5 1.5
8 Larry Turner 1745 W11 H--- L4 U--- 1.5 $5.00 GOW
9 Dean W Brown 1425 L1 D7 U--- U--- 0.5
10 Lawrence R Osborn 974 L3 L5 L7 L6 0.0
11 Grayson Ed Harris 1034 L8 U--- U--- U--- 0.0

Top Ten